We are not a law firm. This website gives general information and self-help forms that you choose and fill in yourself; it is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney. What you tell us is not protected by attorney-client privilege.
Plain-language guides for people who were towed, and the audits, reports and court rulings behind them. Each summary is ours; follow the link to read the original.
Newest first. Government reports are public records; the others belong to their authors, so we link to them and do not post copies.
MRSC's overview for local governments of when officers may impound under chapter 46.55 RCW, how cities and counties can add local impound situations by ordinance (RCW 46.55.240), mandatory DUI impounds, and sample local codes.
Why it matters: Shows how state impound law and city ordinances fit together.
Last checked .
Staff analysis of a 2024 bill that responded to City of Seattle v. Long. It summarizes current impound law and what the bill would have changed for vehicles used as homes: impound as a last resort, no auction sale, a hearing within two business days, fee waivers, and the government paying the tow company when a court reduces the bill.
Why it matters: A short official account of how impound law treats people who live in their vehicles, and what lawmakers considered changing.
The bill did not pass. None of its proposals are law.
Last checked .
The nonpartisan staff report explains the background (the Long decision and the WSU report funded in the 2022 supplemental transportation budget) and what the bill would have done: court release of vehicle homes, ability-to-pay reductions in tow and storage fees, late hearing requests for good cause, and a state account to repay tow companies.
Why it matters: A short official explanation of how impound hearings work today and what was proposed for people who cannot pay.
Last checked .
The Legislature asked WSU to bring together advocates for people living in vehicles, legal aid groups, tow operators, municipal courts, fire officials, and cities and counties after the Long decision. The report proposes treating towing as a last resort for vehicle homes that are not a safety hazard, a way for officers and tow operators to recognize a vehicle home, more legal parking, letting courts release a vehicle home at an impound hearing, and not impounding vehicle homes only for unpaid tickets or expired tabs.
Why it matters: The main official study of how towing rules work for people who live in their vehicles in Washington.
These are a work group's proposals. They are not law; bills based on them (SB 5730 in 2023, HB 2359 in 2024) did not pass. The report's full official title is shortened here (Washington copy rules); the linked PDF carries it.
Last checked .
The office reports letters to more than 400 tow truck operators in September 2021 and court orders against tow companies that sold active-duty service members' vehicles without the court order federal law requires. One 2022 order required $13,087 in restitution to three service members, $4,000 to the office, and new compliance policies.
Why it matters: Shows the extra protection active-duty service members have before a lien sale.
Last checked .
MRSC, a research service for Washington local governments, explains what the Long decision means for cities: a vehicle used as a home gets homestead protection from being sold to pay impound debts, and courts must look at a person's means when deciding whether impound costs are an excessive fine. Cities can still cite and impound.
Why it matters: How local governments were told to read the ruling.
Last checked .
A law school policy brief on people living in vehicles in Washington. It reviews city ordinances and finds that, besides laws aimed directly at vehicle living, ordinary traffic penalties, including fines and impounds, fall hardest on people who live in their vehicles.
Why it matters: Background on why impound costs became the issue in City of Seattle v. Long five years later.
An advocacy-oriented academic brief, not a government report.
Last checked .
The nonpartisan staff report on the 2013 law that first capped what tow companies may charge for private impounds. It explains the difference between police-directed and private impounds, the 135% and 100% limits tied to State Patrol rates, the exceptions (other truck classes, accidents, tows the owner asked for), and that only supporters testified.
Why it matters: Explains where the private-impound cap in RCW 46.55.118 came from and what it covers.
The cap is on the rates in a company's filed fee schedule, measured against State Patrol rates when the company filed; it is not a flat dollar amount.
Last checked .
Court rulings about towing in Washington. A case decides the dispute in front of the court; whether it applies to a tow depends on the facts.
Last checked .